#5 What To Watch For When the Talking is Over
and It's Time to Get the Deal in Writing
By Roger Dawson
Most people think of negotiating as the verbal give and take that takes people from their different wants and needs to a point of agreement. That, of course, is the heart of negotiating but just as important is the transition to the written contract that formalizes the verbal agreement.
Here are the things that Power Negotiators look for as they move toward the written
contract:
Don't Let the Other Side Write the Contract.
In a typical negotiation, you verbally negotiate the details, then put it into writing
later for both parties to review and approve. I've yet to run across a situation where we
covered every detail in the verbal negotiation. There are always points that we overlooked
when we were verbally negotiating that we must detail in writing. Then we have to get the
other side to approve or negotiate the points when we sit down to sign the written
agreement-that's when the side that writes the contract has a tremendous advantage over
the side that doesn't. Chances are that the person writing the agreement will think of at
least half-dozen things that did not come up during the verbal negotiations. That person
can then write the clarification of that point to his or her advantage, leaving the other
side to negotiate a change in the agreement when asked to sign it. Don't let the other side write the contract because it puts you at a disadvantage. This
applies to brief counter proposals just as much as it does to agreements that are hundreds
of pages long. For example, a real estate agent may be presenting an offer to the sellers
of an apartment building. The seller agrees to the general terms of the offer, but wants
the price to be $5,000 higher. At that point either the listing agent who represents the
seller or the selling agent who represents the buyer could pull a counter-proposal form
out of his or her briefcase and write out a brief counter-offer for the seller to sign.
Then the selling agent will present to the buyer for approval. It doesn't have to be
complicated: "Offer accepted except that price is to be $598,000," will suffice.
If the listing agent writes the counter-offer, however, he or she might think of some
things that would benefit her seller. She might write, "Offer accepted except that
price to be $598,000. Additional $5,000 to be deposited in escrow upon acceptance.
Counter-offer to be accepted upon presentation and within 24 hours." If the selling agent were to write the counter-offer, he might write, "Offer
accepted except that price is to be $598,000. Additional $5,000 to be added to the note
that the seller is carrying back." These additions are probably not big enough to be
challenged by either a seller or a buyer who is eager to complete the transaction;
however, they substantially benefit the side who wrote the brief counter-offer. If the person who writes a one-paragraph counter-offer can affect it so much, think how
much that person could affect a multi-page contract. Remember that this may not just be a
matter of taking advantage of the other side. Both sides may genuinely think that they had
reached agreement on a point whereas their interpretations may be substantially different
when they write it out. A classic example of this is the Camp David accord, signed by President Carter,
President Anwar Sadat of Egypt, and Prime Minister Menachem Begin of Israel. After 13
frustrating days of negotiating at Camp David where they all felt until the last moment
that their efforts were futile, they reached what they thought was a breakthrough to
agreement. Excitedly they flew helicopters to Washington and with massive publicity signed
the accord. In the East Room, the normally unemotional Menachem Begin turned to his wife
and said, "Mama, we'll go down in the history books tonight." That may be so,
but the truth is that many years later, hardly any of the elements of the agreement had
gone into effect. Their enthusiasm led each of them to think that they had reached
agreement when they really hadn't. If you are to be the one writing the contract, it's a good idea to keep notes
throughout the negotiation and put a check mark in the margin against any point that will
be part of the final agreement. This does two things:
- It reminds you to include all the points that you wanted.
- When you write the contract, you may be reluctant to include a point in the agreement
unless you can specifically recall the other side agreeing to it.
Your notes will give you the confidence to include it even if you don't remember it
clearly. If you have been team negotiating, be sure to have all the other members of your
team review the contract before you present it to the other side. You may have overlooked
a point that you should have included or you may have misinterpreted a point. It's common for the lead negotiator to let her enthusiasm overwhelm her to a point that
she feels that the other side agreed to something when it was less than clear to more
independent observers. I'm not a big believer in having attorneys conduct a negotiation
for you because so few of them are good negotiators. They tend to be confrontational
negotiators because they're used to threatening the other side into submission, and they
are seldom open to creative solutions because their first obligation is to keep you out of
trouble, not make you money. Remember that in law school, they are not taught how to make
deals, only how to break deals. In our litigious society there isn't much point in making an agreement that won't hold
up in court, however, so it's a good idea to have the agreement approved by your attorney
before you have it signed. In a complicated agreement what you prepare and have the other
side sign may be no more than a letter of intent. Have the attorneys work on it later to
make it a legal document. It's better that you devote your energy to reaching agreement. If you have prepared an agreement that you think the other side may be reluctant to
sign, you may be smart to include the expression "Subject to your attorney's
approval," to encourage them to sign it. Once the verbal negotiations are over, get a
memorandum of agreement signed as quickly as possible. The longer you give them before
they see it in writing, the greater the chances that they'll forget what they agreed to
and question what you've prepared. Also, make sure they understand the agreement. Don't be tempted to have them sign
something when you know they're not clear on the implications. If they don't understand
and something goes wrong, they will always blame you. They will never accept
responsibility. I find it helpful to write out the agreement I want before I go into the
negotiations. I don't show it to the other side, but I find it helpful to compare it to
the agreement that we eventually reach, so that I can see how well I did. Sometimes it's easy to get excited because the other side is making concessions that
you didn't expect to get. Then your enthusiasm carries you forward and you agree to what
you feel is a fantastic deal. It may be a good deal, but unless you have clearly
established your criteria up front, it may not be the deal that you hoped to get. Power Negotiators know that you should always try to be the one that writes the
contract. When the verbal negotiations are over, it's time for someone to put everything
in writing, and the person who gets to put it in writing has definite power in the
negotiations. There are bound to be little details that you didn't think of when you were
verbally negotiating that need to be specified in the written contract. If you're the one who gets to write the contract, you can write those to your favor.
Then it's up to the other person to negotiate them out when it comes to signing the
contract. So, try to be the one who writes the contract. I'll say to the other people,
"Look, we need to put this down in writing. But let's not go to a lot of expense on
this. I have an attorney on retainer, it won't cost either one of us anything for me to
have my attorney do it." Even if I had to pay the attorney to do it, I still think
I'd be better off to be the one who is writing the contract.
Read the Contract Every Time In this age of computer-generated contracts, it's a sad fact
that you have to reread a contract every time it comes across your desk. In the old days,
when contracts were typewritten, both sides would go through it and write in any changes,
and then each negotiator would initial the change. You could glance through the contract
and quickly review any change that you had made or to which you had agreed. Nowadays with
computer generated contracts we're more likely to go back to the computer, make the
change, and print out a new contract. Here's the danger. You may have refused to sign a clause in a contract. The other side
agrees to change it and says they'll send you a corrected contract for your signature.
When it comes across your desk, you're busy, so you quickly review it to see that they
made the change you wanted and then turn to the back page and sign it. Unfortunately,
because you didn't take the time to reread the entire contract, you didn't realize that
they had also changed something else. Perhaps it was something blatant such as changing
"F.O.B. factory" to "F.O.B. job site." Or it may be such a minor
change in wording that you don't discover it until years later when something goes wrong,
and you need the contract to enforce some action. By then, you may not even remember what
you agreed to, and you can only assume that because you signed it you must have agreed to
it. Yes, I agree with you-you have a wonderful case for a lawsuit that the other side
defrauded you-but why expose yourself to that kind of trouble? In this age of
computer-generated contracts, you should read the contract all the way through, every time
it comes across your desk for signature.
People Believe What They See In Writing
The printed word has great power over people. Most people believe what they see in
writing, even if they won't believe it when they just hear about it. The Candid Camera people did a stunt to prove that a number of years ago -- you may
remember seeing it on television. They posted a sign on a road next to a golf course in
Delaware that said, "Delaware Closed." Allen Fount stood by the sign in a rented
trooper's uniform. He wasn't allowed to speak to the people as they came up, only point up
at the sign. What happened amazed me. People were coming to a screeching halt and saying
things like, "How long is it going to be closed for? My wife and kids are
inside." People believe what they see in writing. That's why I'm such a big believer in
presentation binders. When you sit down with someone, you open the presentation binder,
and it says, "My company is the greatest widget manufacturer in the world." Then
you turn another page and it says, "Our workers are the greatest craftsmen in the
business." You turn another page and start showing them reference letters from all
your previous jobs. They find it believable even when they know you just came from the
print shop with it. This is how hotels are able to get people to check out of the rooms on time. Holiday
Inns used to have a terrible time getting people to check out of their rooms at 12 noon,
until they learned the art of the printed word and posted those little signs on the back
of the door. Now 97 percent of the guests check out of their rooms on time, without any
question at all, because the written word is so believable. Recognize this when you're negotiating with people. In our litigious society, it's
essential to eventually get your agreement into writing. As regrettable as it may seen, it
doesn't make much sense to verbally negotiate an agreement unless the other side is
willing to attest to it in writing somewhere down the line. Power negotiators know that it's important to wean the other side onto seeing in
writing what they are agreeing to verbally. So every chance you get put things in writing.
Take the time during the verbal negotiations to say, "Let me be sure that I
understand what you're proposing." Then stop to write down your understanding of the
point that you were discussing. Show it to the other side, but you don't have to have them
sign it at this point. All you're doing is getting them used to seeing it in writing. This
subliminally confirms what, up to that point, has only bee a verbal understanding. If you
do this at intervals during the discussion, you'll have much less trouble getting them to
sign the final written contract. It's important to realize that, at every point of the negotiation, the other side is
more persuaded by what they see in writing. For example, if you have salespeople selling
for you and you have to put a price change into effect, be sure that they have it in
writing. Because there's a world of difference between them sitting with a potential
customer and saying, "We're having a price increase at the start of next month, so
you should make a commitment now," and them saying, "Look at this letter I just
got from my boss. It indicates that we're having a price increase on July 1st."
Always show it to people in writing whenever you can. If you're negotiating by telephone,
back up what you're saying by also faxing them the information.
If you sell big-ticket items and don't have a method of creating computer-generated
proposals, I'd suggest that you stop everything and go get a computer system right now.
It'll pay for itself on the first job. Many years ago I was in Australia on a lecture tour and a fire broke out on the second
floor of my home in California. When I returned I had three contractors bid on repairing
the damage. Two of them scrawled out bids by hand. They both bid around $24,000. The third
contractor prepared a very comprehensive bid by computer. Every little detail was spelled
out in detail. But his bid was $49,000-more than twice as much. I accepted the higher bid
because the Power of the Printed Word was so great that I just didn't trust the
hand-written bids. What's the bottom line? Because people don't question what they see in writing, you should always present
written backup evidence to support your proposal. If the negotiation includes expectations
that the other side will meet certain requirements, it also helps to confirm those
requirements in writing.
The transition from a verbal negotiation to a written contract can be a delicate one, but
Power Negotiators known how to set it up so that it doesn't become a traumatic experience.
This article is excerpted in part from Roger Dawson's new book-Secrets of Power
Negotiating, published by Career Press and on sale in bookstores everywhere for $24.99.
|